Characters are being updated now for Dragonflight Expansion!
- Item Level Character Rankings
- SimDPS
Also check:
- Guild Item Level Rankings
- Item Level Character Rankings
- SimDPS
Also check:
- Guild Item Level Rankings
Comments: 21
#1 WoW Rankings Website
© 2008-2024 WoWProgress.com, WOWPROGRESS LLC
Guild Progress Diablo 3 Ladder Terms of Service Privacy Policy FAQ Contact
Tell your friends about WoWProgress!
x
Login FormLogin incorrect
registration
restore password |
Yavimaya#1637
Just some option for guilds to manually switch between 10-man and 25-man raids might be enough for recruiting, but isn't for interesting rankings. That´s what your page was about over the years. People are interested in rankings cause everyone wants to compete - not just some worldfirsts guild - there is a competition at every single server. That´s why ppl were showing up at your site. To compare their guild with others. That´s not possible anylonger if you won't change it to sth. more suitable for this situation.
Your solution is pretty neat for recruiting purposes, but won't change a thing for all other purposes. I hope you won't stick to that.
The subject is obviously an improvement.
Regarding separated rankings, once we find a reliable solution to separate 10- and 25-man, we will release it, I don't want to receive emails such as "your site is wrong, fix our rating" just because the rating sometimes doesn't work correctly with 10- or 25-man.
If a guild labels themself as a 25 man guild then over 20 guild members need to have the kill achievement for it to update on your site. So if they kill a boss on 10 man, only 10 people get the achievement and so no progress update.
If a guild labels themself as a 10 man guild, then only 10 people in the guild need the achievement for it to update on your site.
I really don't see the problem with this method, as every boss on heroic rewards an achievement it can't be difficult to track.
If a guild labels themself as '10 or 25 man' then just specify on their page on which setting they killed it. Though this is a non-issue imo as no serious raiding guild is 10 or 25 man, they can only viably focus on one.
if the guild kills the boss in 10 man and in 25 man afterwards, the guild will not have 20 players with the same achievement timestamp.
you still cant distinguish between 10 and 25 man reliable. only firstkills in 10 OR 25.
Yes, it will only work for first kills however, so you'd technically have to rank based on First Kill.
Basically, say you have 20+ Achievements from Ensidia for Nefarion dated 14/12/10, you can assume that it was most probably a 25 Player Kill, so tag them under "Tier 11 (25)."
The next day Paragon gets 8+ Achievements for Nefarion dated 15/12/10, you can therefore assume that kill was done in 10 Player Mode.
Flaw: 2 Teams kill the Boss same day, 20 Achievements. That's where the current Guild Profile Raid Size Tagging thing comes in. If you're tagged as 25, it will only post under 25. If you're tagged as 10, it will only post under 10, regardless of how many Achievements dinged.
Yes, it doesn't solve the flaw of 1 Guild 2 10 Teams killing the Boss same day, but its a start. I think people would prefer that to the 1 Page there's now.
If you force Guilds to choose a Ranking, then there's no problem with missing Guilds.
Yes, it still won't be 100% accurate.
I still don't understand how other Sites (Guildox) are getting Time Stamps on their Boss Kills. Are we missing the obvious here or something?
Yavimaya#1637
Your site is "downgraded" cause now it misses reliable PvE rankings not just for 25-man guilds. I guess you miss the point, that not only world top guilds want to see seperated rankings. Read my post from above - there are many guilds who want to compete on their server within their skill level.
There are many reliable solutions ppl. have stated in the comments of your last post. Furthermore there are many ppl. who will surely help you to modify or add things to this page.
You are right, if sth. might be wrong with your page, or sth. isn't the right way in s.o. opinion this person needs to state constructive criticism. Constructive criticism is always good for both sides of a special opinion. I encourage everyone to state constructive criticism and not just post some rnd flame. In return i want to encourage you Kernel to read and try to understand those critics and think about a solution which is best for all.
Btw Kernel, any chance of making separate 10 and 25 Rankings based on this? It won't be 100% accurate but I think we can trust the Top Guilds not to cheat. Besides, there's always Screenshots of Boss Kills.
Yavimaya#1637
no update is not = 25 look at ensidia
We have 25 man guilds that already did most of normal content on 10 man how will they get ranked? Or guilds that simply dont know/bother with the site how will they get ranked and snd so on. Way to many parameters that make it unreliable.
noxa only progresses with 10man and to think 25man is harder at all, you re wrong too. i saw both versions of nearly every fight, you too? indeed positioning is a problem for council and alakir.
but in 25man you have so much more options like an extra tank... priest ae bubble... more kickers... kiters...
some were harder in 25 man, others in 10man, thats a fact.
easy fame? go try! noxas goal wasnt fame, dont blame noxa for just playing the game with 10 pretty good players
Nice try though, now You look even more pathetic ! Go go make Your logs private now so people won't laugh.
Guild Profile: semi-hardcore
pretty good defined, dont you think?
logs are up since last night, people arent even able to read before they talk bullshit
sorry for destroying your little dreamworld, but i guess there is always someone out there like you
Fallin#2401
Fivreld
Fallin#2401
Fivreld
If they killed ANY boss on 10 man first, they're not a 25 man guild. Simple.
Halby#2239
Halby
even if 10 and 25 are equal in difficulty.
its much easier to see the fails in 10er, who failed, who didnt run out of the raid...
its much easier to get 10man in the raid at 10am.
the positioning is normally much easier in 10er. see ascendant council p3.
the communication is much easier in 10er.
and maybe there are some more important points, but all that things are enough for me to say 10man? no fking way!
and right now its easier to get 10 people raid buffed. its a hell on our server to find a agi flask or the materials for it in the AH. and every herb point is overfarmed.
Idea - Enable filter on the recruite part to filter by raid size will help big time but im afraid until you solve the ranking issue and split the 2 different raid sizes your ranking is wrong and currently cause more problems and miss understandings then anything else
This site was the best for long time and i think all of the above wants it to be the best
Zosima
Luun#2576
Luunbear
I did change the guild to a 10man guild about a week ago, didn't help much.
Numbers Mate on Sunstrider EU
Tilicaru
As i sayed we raid 25 man , we marked ourself 25 man guild on the site but now we would like to do some 10mans some hard bosses like cho`gall , nef , al`akir and i want to know if the kill will be register in the t11 tab (there is t11.25 t11.10 , t11 , so the t11 is general i guess ). thx